Further, Emmanuel Kant, one of the main proponents of deontological philosophies argues that what one must act in a way that he would wish him/herself/family members to be treated (Waller, 2005). He argues that one should not just consider the end, but also the means and motives that prompt such actions. Thus, the deontologists are mostly against the physically assisted deaths. The following discussion focuses on the viewpoints of deontologists and consequentialists on a number of issues:
Individual rights and concerns
Both the consequentialists and the deontologists believe that human beings have individual rights that should be protected (Orend, 2005). They believe in the universal rights for all human beings. However, there appear differences in how the two argue for the right to life (Kelly, 2006). The consequentialists believe that the right to life means that an individual can choose when they want to terminate their lives. According to them, death should be a private affair, and that only an individual can have the right to speak about whether they want to live or not.
Every person exists independently and that whoever lives has his/her end to themselves. If they choose to and no one may compulsorily hamper zest to live or die, that I the same breadth that everybody has liberty to live, to be happy and pursue their dreams ,they also have a choice to die. Despite the fact that people ha directly to get joy and happiness they want, when a tragedy hits, an unpleasant ill health attacks, or some other disaster get rid of all life’s delight also in it foliage a specific with only aches, powerful struggling and anguish, the right to real also pertains and so the legal right to perish apllies.In this situation you needn’t speak to any approval to remain enduring, one in his proper opinion an elect to last part the majority of the misery. By wondering help in concluding own reality. Types that want assisted suicide to become respectable support that people should have control of the time and conditions of their own death.
Discover who is the greatest by checking our our offered writing services
Other proponents argue that when a specific determines to end their lifetime, is tantamount to rejecting all medical treatment or health-related healing, subsequently opting to perish.The proponents likewise reason that an individual may chooses to cease experiencing to alleviate the economic problem this relatives and family and friends. One who speculates that ha slim risks of very long tactical ca choose to be helped I perishing to steer clear of impoverishing family and friends who will possibly result in marketing paramount property or experiencing financial debt to a great medication thats generally terminal and that also would definitely result in demise at some moment in time just in time, soon enough or subsequently.
An additional reflection is theological: Christians who happen to be proponents of assisted suicide guard it by interpreting that the Lord which they really enjoy is forbearing, caring and loving, and God would not desire to see them in anguish. If they accelerated the end of their life to evade lingering pain, and intolerable affliction, they reason that their God as being is not unforgiving as denying them Heavenly Kingdom.